Yeah, denying interclient traffic is kind of what I had in mind. I wonder if
they're doing that.

Regarding the firewall rules, I'm not sure what value add they might have.

Mike Ellsworth
The WiMAX Guys, LLC
StratVantage Consulting, LLC
952-525-1584
mellsworth at stratvantage.com
www.StratVantage.com
www.TheWiMAXGuys.com
Get a free one-hour wireless network evaluation. Forward this message to
freebie at theWiMAXGuys.com
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety.
 Ben Franklin, ~1784


-----Original Message-----
From: tcwug-list-bounces at tcwug.org [mailto:tcwug-list-bounces at tcwug.org] On
Behalf Of Andy Warner
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 11:12 AM
To: Mike Ellsworth
Cc: 'Twin Cities Wireless Users Group List'
Subject: Re: [TCWUG] Another point on the wifi hotspot business model
curve..

Mike Ellsworth wrote:
> The most interesting thing I got from this article is T-Mobile's claim
that
> it is more secure (and more reliable) than free hotspots. Anybody got any
> idea how they can claim that? I've used their service and it wasn't
running
> any security as far as I could tell.

What about firewall rules to/from the internet and between
attached clients ? I can see them having a canned config
that might be better than some coffee store owner with
a cable modem and a linksys - both running nearly default
config..
-- 
andyw at pobox.com

Andy Warner		Voice: (612) 801-8549	Fax: (208) 575-5634

_______________________________________________
Twin Cities Wireless Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul,
Minnesota
http://www.tcwug.org
tcwug-list at tcwug.org
https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tcwug-list


_______________________________________________
Twin Cities Wireless Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
http://www.tcwug.org
tcwug-list at tcwug.org
https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tcwug-list