other places of interest. > > > > > > If anyone is planning on doing this, are you looking at 802.11b, a, > > or that motorola canopy stuff? 802.11b is 1/5 the speed of 802.11a, > > and 802.11a isn't too much more expensive. Wouldn't it make sense > > to use a faster technology? > > > .11a seems to offer the greatest amount of b/w for the buck but my > only hangup with it is the modest distance that it can support. this > may not be as big an issue with the appropriate antenna h/w. perhaps > the RF wonks amongst us can comment on this ... Well, we're going to need point-to-point links to get between the different areas we want to cover. The links can be whatever we need them to be to get the job done. I think we'll always want to have 802.11b at the user access points. If we start maxing it out we can add an 802.11a card there. If we start out using the cheaper equipment we can always move things around later as our needs change. -- Bryan Halvorson bryan at edgar.sector14.net