Re: (ASCEND) Relaxation of the three digit NAT rule???

[Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>]

At 11:35 1998/02/17 -0500, David Lesher wrote:
>Did I read somewhere that later code removed the restriction
>that the local private address space HAD to be xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>vice any of the octets being only 2 digit?

correct, that was somewhere around Pipeline release 5.0Ai13/16.
not available in 5.0B for new P75s, but should be in 5.1 for all
units that support NAT

-Jim H
----
Jim Howard             Sr Network Engineer        Lyceum Internet
jhoward@lyceum.com     http://www.lyceum.com/     404.248.1733     

My PGP Public Key: http://www.lyceum.com/~jhoward/pgp-key.txt
Fingerprint: 7E8B E2BA 1314 2535 CB08  CFF9 119B 7CD3 2488 954D

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) # in RADIUS users file (fwd)
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) CLID Authentication Bug?
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Relaxation of the three digit NAT rule???
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) # in RADIUS users file (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread