Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) NAT: Yadda yadda yadda
On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, William T Wilson wrote:
> Ascend probably never expected anyone to use NAT over a T1 link, most
> people that pay for a T1 can get their ISP to assign them whatever they
> ask. NAT was probably expected only over ISDN. And I wouldn't expect
> 50-75 hosts on an ISDN link either. :) (Although as I said, I'm going to
> put about 30 on one :) )
Just a side note not related to NAT:
I've successfully run a 30+-host subnet (for a website design company,
no less!) off of an ISDN line and a P50, without terribly bogging down
the link. The biggest drain of bandwidth was all of the Word documents
our clients kept sending us as attachments in email -- usually addressed
to 4-6 recipients at our company.
Last I knew, they were well over 50 hosts and still using the same ISDN
line without too many complaints...
--
Devin L. Ganger <devin@premier1.net>
Chief Systems Administrator
Premier1 Internet Services
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: