Re: (ASCEND) Reduced speed after upgrading to 6.1.3

To: Leon McCalla <ascend@caribbeanlink.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Reduced speed after upgrading to 6.1.3
From: "David C. Troy" <dave@toad.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 1998 13:31:31 -0400 (EDT)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <000801bda7b3$29233640$440610cf@leon.caribbeanlink.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> I haven't looked at 6.1.3 but 6.1.0 may be a little slower than 5.0Ap51 if
> you have 61 calls accross 95 ISDN chanells like I do. I really wanted to
> offer PPTP to my customers but if Ascend sees fit to remove it in 6.1.3 it
> can't be working too well anyway. Ap42 was the most stable code in my
> opinion but i couldn't stay there due to UDP attacks.  If your having
> trouble like I was with Ap51 try 6.0.8.
> 
> I am begining to thing that just as 6.0 required too much memory for the old
> pipelines, 6.0 may require a faster CPU like the 6000s.

Ok -- so anybody want to try to come up with a CPU overclock hack for the
i960?  Sounds like a blast to me... :)  We don't need no stinking 6000's!

Dave



++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Reduced speed after upgrading to 6.1.3

From: "Leon McCalla" <ascend@caribbeanlink.com>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) DBM(gdbm), and default clause
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) leaking pools in 6.1.0
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Reduced speed after upgrading to 6.1.3
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Reduced speed after upgrading to 6.1.3
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread