Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) v.90 code still running
At 04:29 PM 7/6/98 -0500, Marcel Brown wrote:
>>The guy "doing it right" is simply not accepting digital (ISDN) calls using
>>MPP. That is the cause of the IP address pool leak.
>
>I've been running 6.1.3 for over a week now and I accept ISDN calls, as
>well as analog, using multi-link PPP. So far, so good. No IP pool leaks.
Actually I think the secret here is that you *are* allowing MP calls. Those
that are not, and get *failed* attempts as a result seem to be getting the
pool leak most prevalently.
>Is there a difference between MP and MPP when used in the IP pool leak
context?
Not implicitly. Most likely with MPP the *attempt* to add a second channel is
not attempted when not "allowed" (due to the negotiation in MPP). With MP,
it's
a try-it-and-see approach. [See, MP+ does still have some merits!].
Kevin Smith Ascend Communications...
Customer Satisfaction ...where Network Solutions never end.
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: