Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 stacking

To: Sajari <sajari@staff.singnet.com.sg>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 stacking
From: Dean Frye <dfrye@ascend.com.au>
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 1998 22:42:06 +1000
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.93.980707092623.24434A-100000@singapura.singnet.com.sg>
References: <3.0.5.32.19980706131535.009b7750@spanky.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 09:27 AM 7/7/98 +0800, Sajari wrote:
>
>Hi there!
>
>Can i know what is the recommended number of Max 4000 on a single stack?


Sajari,

There is a channel per MAX limitation of 40. In practice, this is not a
serious limitation, and the real limit is the ethernet bandwidth required
by stacking.

The MAX6000 with 100bT is much more capable for stacking.


Kind Regards,

dean





===============================================================
Dean Frye.                       Regional Technical Specialist.
                            ________
Ascend Asia Pacific        |   /\   |   http://apac.ascend.com/
Level 38/55 Collins        |  /__\  |   em: dfrye@ascend.com.au
Melbourne, Victoria        | //  \\ |   Voice:   +61.3.96567000
Australia 3000             |/ \__/ \|   Mobile:   +61.418546635
                             ASCEND     
===============================================================
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 stacking

From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>

Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 stacking

From: Sajari <sajari@staff.singnet.com.sg>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) New Problem
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Default route on a Pipeline
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 stacking
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 4000 stacking
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread