Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(ASCEND) Re: Ticket # 240400
An update: we got a Fatal Error 29 after the Max had been up for less
than 24 hours, so we've gone back to 5.0Ap51, which has a memory leak,
but at least it's stable other than that.
--- Original message ---
I saw this on 6.1.0, Max 4004, OSPF, stacking, two PRI circuits, with
mixed analog and ISDN calls:
WARNING: Index: 140 Load: ftik.m40 Revision: 6.1.0
Date: 05/31/1998. Time: 20:47:35
Location: b001c944 b001cbfc b001cc1c b016a358 b001c750 b0012280
Other than that, the only problem I ve seen is that this release
leaves MUCH less free memory available. "pools -v" used to hover
around a megabyte (at least on releases other than 5.0Ap48 and
5.0Ap51, which have a memory leak). It now is between 600K and 700K,
presumably because of new features. It s too early to tell if there s
a memory leak in this release. Time to check out NSSA OSPF areas, I
guess...
--- End of original message ---
--
Bruce Robertson, President/CEO +1-702-348-7299
Great Basin Internet Services, Inc. fax: +1-702-348-9412
PGP Key fingerprint = 03 2D A8 4A 37 07 FB 53 EB C9 02 5C E5 10 66 F2
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>