Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(ASCEND) Re: Ticket # 240400



An update: we got a Fatal Error 29 after the Max had been up for less
than 24 hours, so we've gone back to 5.0Ap51, which has a memory leak,
but at least it's stable other than that.


 --- Original message ---
I saw this on 6.1.0, Max 4004, OSPF, stacking, two PRI circuits, with
mixed analog and ISDN calls:

WARNING:  Index: 140  Load: ftik.m40 Revision: 6.1.0
        Date: 05/31/1998.       Time: 20:47:35
        Location: b001c944 b001cbfc b001cc1c b016a358 b001c750 b0012280

Other than that, the only problem I ve seen is that this release
leaves MUCH less free memory available.  "pools -v" used to hover
around a megabyte (at least on releases other than 5.0Ap48 and
5.0Ap51, which have a memory leak).  It now is between 600K and 700K,
presumably because of new features.  It s too early to tell if there s
a memory leak in this release.  Time to check out NSSA OSPF areas, I
guess...
 --- End of original message ---

--
Bruce Robertson, President/CEO				     +1-702-348-7299
Great Basin Internet Services, Inc.			fax: +1-702-348-9412
PGP Key fingerprint = 03 2D A8 4A 37 07 FB 53  EB C9 02 5C E5 10 66 F2
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>