Re: (ASCEND) What V.90 works for 4048?

To: John Chase <john@thenap.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) What V.90 works for 4048?
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 17:06:25 -0400 (EDT)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 30 Jun 1998 15:49:06 EDT." <6A281BCBD2BCD0119C0E00609773FE6325B2BA@goliath.ops.columbus-nap.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> IM am running version 6.1.0 V.90 code and seeing good results on an max
> 4048

Of course it's a YMMV kind of thing, but I had bad results with 6.1.0.
6.1.3 works well for me (pool leaks have never been manifested in my
environment).

The problem I was having with 6.1.0 was that digital calls were being
connected and then immediately disconnected again before any packets were
exchanged. Problem appears after a few days of uptime, and disappears
again on a reboot.

-Phil
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

RE: (ASCEND) What V.90 works for 4048?

From: John Chase <john@thenap.com>

Prev by Date: RE: (ASCEND) What V.90 works for 4048?
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Single Vs. Dual Terminal Mode
Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) What V.90 works for 4048?
Next by thread: RE: (ASCEND) What V.90 works for 4048?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread