Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Am I the only one ??
Hi Gary and Neale and all,
I wnat to hear from Ascend too.
Here in Brazil I see both occuring:
1) NO connections above 28.8K in "back channel", even if connection is as
good as 54000 bps. I asked Ascend once, but they just said "check your
client line", which is NOT the answer;
2) NO connections above 54000 bps, no matter what we do. Like Neale, we
don't have US limitations, and use E1 (2MB), 30 x 64K channels.
Regards,
Ricardo
________________________________
All Ways Provedor Digital
www.allways.com.br
100% fibra ótica, 100% modems de 56K
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Neale Banks <neale@idesign.com.au>
Para: Gary Stern <cairns@cairns.net.au>
Cc: ascend-users <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Data: Domingo, 27 de Setembro de 1998 06:50
Assunto: Re: (ASCEND) Am I the only one ??
>Hi Gary,
>
>On Sun, 27 Sep 1998, Gary Stern wrote:
>
>> I have just been examining my logs and have noticed that if k56 or
>> v.90 is used the users back channel is never a greater speed than
>> 28800, I thought the standard was 33600.
>
>You're definitely not the only one - we see up to 28.8k too. My
>understanding is that that's the limit of the back-channel, as spec'd.
>
>What I would _really_ like to know is how we (with A-law codecs and 64k
>clear-channels) got short-changed into a 56k limit (which seems
>appropriate for the USA, but somewhat of an artificial limit for the rest
>of the world).
>
>Regards,
>Neale.
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups: