Re: (ASCEND) Clarification of Pool allocation requested

[Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>]

> Could this be the reason a lot of our users are complaining of sudden
> disconnections ? ie, the maxes in question roll into the second pool and
> duplicate addresses begin getting dished out to multiple users ?

I doubt that the end result would be a disconnected, Unless the MAX
just plain ran out of I.P. Addresses , with Overlapping Wan Pool
addresses the user would most likley not be able to route. 

To see what addresses are being assigned from term tersv
type 

show pool

Jason Nealis
Director Internet Operations
Network Access
Erols Internet


> 
> I removed the troublesome pools this morning and we'll see how that goes.
> 
> - Kurt
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• (ASCEND) Clarification of Pool allocation requested
• From: "Kurt Schafer" <kschafer@cyberbeach.net>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) RIP route filters (P50/MAX1800)
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) RIP route filters (P50/MAX1800)
• Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Clarification of Pool allocation requested
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) Explanation of software codes
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread