Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
Once upon a time Jason Nealis shaped the electrons to say...
>Now if I heard Lucent correct at COMMNET, They said it will fall
>back to Kflex speeds correct?
That is what they intend to do, and what will most likely be. Unless
some insurmountable wall pops up.
>My question is for any particular NAS, Is there enough room on the DSP's
>for both codes?, Hell, When KFLEX first came out (ASCEND and ROCKWELL)
We greatly overdesigned the DSP and memory for the PM-3 just to have a
wide safety margin. It shouldn't be a problem. I'd be kind of surprised
if Rockwell/Ascend didn't do the same on the new modem cards.
>Will Ascend have enough room on the DSP's for
>V.PCM
>KFLEX
>V.FAST
>V.FC
Don't forget all the V.34, V.32, etc. ;-)
>I'm guessing not, So, I'm guessing (yet again) that support
>will be dropped for the older legacy protocols of V.Fast
>and V.FC?
One can only hope... ;-) Sorry, but I wouldn't mourn the passing of
V.FC and V.FAST. (Yes I know it would be a headache, but they need to
die SOMETIME...)
-MZ
--
Lucent Remote Access Division - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com
For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/>
Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups: