Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
At 06:10 PM 2/6/98 -0800, you wrote:
>Once upon a time Kevin A. Smith shaped the electrons to say...
>>>http://www.itu.ch/newsroom/press/releases/1998/98-04.html
>>So, they decided on V.90.....wonder where V.PCM came from....?
>
>V.FAST -> V.34
>V.PCM -> V.90
No, I meant who coined it....
>You need to call it *something* before they decide on a number. ;-)
"The future ITU 56K spec".....
>V.PCM is for Pulse Code Modulation
Thanks. I did know that ;-)
>>Also, many will be happy to know that (the draft at least) V.90
>>does NOT include the V.8bis "burp tone" that has been tripping
>>many legacy modems on connecting.
>
>Of course, there is still the implementation question on how to
>maintain backwards compatibility with K56flex modems that do require
>it... We'll see.
*require* ? Well since Lucent's answer to backward compatibility with
V.FC/V.FAST was a resounding "no".....
Kevin
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: