Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's
Our 1800's seems to failing left and right lately, Weird problems
though, Users dialing into B2 first rather than B1, Circuits coming up
with a M instead of D. Total Weirdness, I actually was blaming telco
for these problems but My finger seems to be finding it's way back to the
1800.
That 3600 is starting to look quite appealing.
Jason Nealis
Director Internet Operations
Network Access
Erols Internet
On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Peter Chow wrote:
> Wish I could say the same for the 5.0Ap42 for the Max 1800.
> We're not running kflex or RIP or OSPF. It was rebooting
> with fatal error 29s.
>
> Maybe that is the problem. Ascend spent all their time
> optimizing Ap42 for everyone running OSPF and stacking
> that they broke it unless you run it :)
>
> Oliver J. Albrecht wrote:
> >
> > In article <EFED58137FA1D111898E00A0C93314683801@medusa.fastrans.net> you wrote:
> >
> > >42 seems very stable for kflex/rip... We have had record uptimes! (More
> > >than 2 weeks!)
> >
> > We're running 5.0Ap42 on a max 4000 (OSPF, K56flex) and a max 2030
> > (K56flex, ripV2) since the day p42 was released. Uptime is now past
> > 30 days, no fat log entries, no obvious memory leaks either etc...
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Peter Chow
> Chief Technical Advisor
> InterQ Inc.
> Tokyo, Japan
> peter@interq.or.jp
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: