Re: (ASCEND) The comparison of 4048 to PM3

To: "Darkshot" <darkshot@chudys.com>, "Jim Logan" <jim@top.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) The comparison of 4048 to PM3
From: "Leon McCalla" <ascend@caribbeanlink.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 23:07:23 -0500
Cc: "Bennie Warren" <bennie@lemoorenet.com>, <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

I have a 4004 which has an average of 91 channels used at all times. Looking
at MRTG i've an average of 37K through-put with a max of about 48K. At any
given time i can still download at greater than 13 or 14 K.

This reminds me of when PCmagazine bashed WebsitePro for not being able to
saturate much more that a T-1. in real life you won't dedicate a 10 Meg
internet connection to a webserver with 32 Meg, a p75 with and an IDE HD.

Leon McCalla

-----Original Message-----
>>   Considering that you would
>> have 23 users, at least connected at up to 53.6K Max speed, it would
appear
>> to me that 100,000K Bps is a serious limitation, yet none of my users are
>> complaining that I've heard of and I routinely have our 4048 maxed out
with
>> 47 Users on at the higher speeds on the two PRI's on the unit.
>>

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Version 6.0
Next by Date: (ASCEND) MAX1800 stuck BRIs
Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) The comparison of 4048 to PM3
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Version 6.0 SNMP Docs
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread