Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2058] Hello.

[Jonathan Ellis <ellisj@cs.byu.edu>]

Dave Ahn wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 03:44:37PM -0500, Jeffrey Nowakowski wrote:
> > Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I can setup vanilla-cow or netrek-cow. Kurt?
> > 
> > Could we just have one client developers list?  Even if I was mainly
> > working on COW I wouldn't mind hearing about Paradise stuff.  The
> > number of client developers is so small I think concentrating them
> > into a single, stable list would be a good thing.
> 
> I think that this is a good idea.  If a lot of traffic for a specific
> client is generated, a separate list can always be setup.
[...]
> > vanilla-clients ?
> > 
> > Meaning all clients that work with the vanilla server.
> 
> Are there any clients that don't?  I would personally lean towards
> 'client-dev', 'cow-dev', 'tedturner-dev', 'server-dev' and so on, but
> that's just aesthetics.  Whatever works.

How active is the paradise list?  How many subcategories do we need?
I wouldn't mind a couple messages a week about the paradise client
(for instance), but not a couple a DAY. :)


-Jonathan