[VANILLA-L:569] Re: ban tester

To: Multiple recipients of list <vanilla-l@anthrax.ecst.csuchico.edu>
Subject: [VANILLA-L:569] Re: ban tester
From: cameron@ripper.stl.dec.com (James Cameron)
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 16:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: vanilla-l@anthrax.ecst.csuchico.edu
Sender: vanilla-l@anthrax.ecst.csuchico.edu

> think you missed my point?

Don't think so.  Why not just use netaccess?  Use whatever technology works.

Unless you want to just _test_ the ban logic?  Why not just add a few lines
to newaccess.c so you see what it is doing?  The matching code is not callable,
you'd have to add to it.

Are you saying that the ban logic still doesn't work for you?

Have you thought of using XSG to cripple the offending player?

--
James Cameron                                    (cameron@stl.dec.com)
Digital Equipment Corporation (Australia) Pty. Ltd. A.C.N. 000 446 800

Prev by Date: [VANILLA-L:583] RE: Notification: message ignored
Next by Date: [VANILLA-L:566] Re: XSG to use gzip?
Prev by thread: [VANILLA-L:566] Re: XSG to use gzip?
Next by thread: [VANILLA-L:583] RE: Notification: message ignored
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread