[VANILLA-L:700] Re: Server code in CVS?

[Alec Habig <habig@budoe.bu.edu>]

James Cameron writes :
> 
> Bob Campbell wrote:
> > If we're at all interested in using CVS to maintain the server code,
> 
> Sigh.  Let's put it to the vote.  Reply to the list.
> I'll count ...
> 
> 	[ ]  Yes, I think we should try CVS,
> 	[ ]  No, leave it as it is.
> 
> I'd like to point out that I would vote no.
> You should have already read why.

I would also vote no.  Without Nick and James to referee the patches
that have been sent in, we would have had a broken server many times.
With a project such as this, with such a wide range of people
contributing a little bit, our current model works better.  CVS works
better if there are a few active programmers and one set of code.

Note that I really like cvs in general, use it everyday for my real work
- but I just don't think it's the best solution for the vanilla server.


-- 
       Alec Habig, Boston University Particle Astrophysics Group
			   habig@budoe.bu.edu
		       http://hep.bu.edu/~habig/

+
++ Vanilla-l Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe vanilla-l" to majordomo@real-time.com
For more information: http://archives.real-time.com

---

References:

• [VANILLA-L:698] Re: [VANILLA-L:697] Re: [VANILLA-L:679] Server code in CVS?
• From: James Cameron <cameron@stl.dec.com>

---

• Prev by Date: [VANILLA-L:701] Re: [VANILLA-L:698] Re: [VANILLA-L:697] Re: [VANILLA-L:679] Server code in CVS?
• Next by Date: [VANILLA-L:699] CVS
• Prev by thread: [VANILLA-L:699] CVS
• Next by thread: [VANILLA-L:701] Re: [VANILLA-L:698] Re: [VANILLA-L:697] Re: [VANILLA-L:679] Server code in CVS?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread