[VANILLA-L:1062] Re: [VANILLA-L:1061] INL Robot

[James Cameron <cameron@stl.dec.com>]

Tom Holub wrote:
> Can I presume from the lack of response to my inquiry that we will
> once again be unable to use the INL Robot this fall?

If you wish, yes.

I was hoping someone else would respond, but in reply to your previous
question, I know of no bugs with the INL Robot, and I don't know whether
the PWstats it does are suitable.

I think we need someone who knows the existing INL server very well to
get together a list of differences between the INL server and the
Vanilla implementation of the INL robot.  Then we could size the work
that needs
doing.

I guess "fall" means "next few months?"

-- 
James Cameron                                    (cameron@stl.dec.com)
Digital Equipment Corporation (Australia) Pty. Ltd. A.C.N. 000 446 800
+
++ Vanilla-l Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe vanilla-l" to majordomo@real-time.com
For more information: http://archives.real-time.com

---

References:

• [VANILLA-L:1061] INL Robot
• From: Tom Holub <doosh@best.com>

---

• Prev by Date: [VANILLA-L:1065] Re: INL Robot
• Next by Date: [VANILLA-L:1064] Re: [VANILLA-L:1063] RE: [VANILLA-L:1062] Re: [VANILLA-L:1061] INL Robot
• Prev by thread: [VANILLA-L:1061] INL Robot
• Next by thread: [VANILLA-L:1064] Re: [VANILLA-L:1063] RE: [VANILLA-L:1062] Re: [VANILLA-L:1061] INL Robot
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread