I meant to write 802.11b on my comment back there. Where were you tonight, you weren't at the TCWUG meeting. I brought some laptops for you. :) Joel -----Original Message----- From: tcwug-list-admin at tcwug.org [mailto:tcwug-list-admin at tcwug.org] On Behalf Of Matthew S. Hallacy Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 9:08 PM To: tcwug-list at tcwug.org Subject: Re: [TCWUG] Bluetooth On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 04:09:22PM -0500, Chris Elmquist wrote: [snip] > You get the same behavior often when trying to run a 2.4 GHz cordless > phone near your 802.11b stuff. The phone just knocks the WLAN equipment > right to zero... even though they are on different "channels" and use > different spreading sequences, they're in the same passband and the > poor receiver gets nailed by the nearby transmitter. Strangely enough my 2.4ghz phone (made by GE) seems incapable of causing interference with my wireless, and the lan doesn't cause any problems with my phone (no static whatsoever) the phone has a range of just over 100 yards, and the Access Point/Phone Base station are only seperated by about 10 feet =) > Hmm... move your 802.11b to 5.7 GHz ? :-) Less range, more expensive. > Chris Elmquist mailto:chrise at pobox.com http://www.pobox.com/~chrise -- Matthew S. Hallacy FUBAR, LART, BOFH Certified http://www.poptix.net GPG public key 0x01938203 _______________________________________________ Twin Cities Wireless Users Group Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.tcwug.org tcwug-list at tcwug.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tcwug-list