On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:33:36PM -0500, Andy Warner wrote: > Speak up Matt. If that's what you're planning, I can supply lat/long/sig/noise > plots for this AP, and you can save the gas. > It depends on how much data, and what format for if it'll be usable. > > We're not inventing any wheels here; we're simply using (and improving?) > > the ones other people invented -- kismet & gpsdrive, et al -- which paint > > a clearer picture. > > I'll take issue that kismet graphs really show meaningful > coverage (hearing one packet does not mean that you can > associate, or move data), but if you guys have the time, > go ahead. The range graphs are obviously simply the range in which the noise propogates, but the radiation graphs are much more useful and correct.. http://www.poptix.net/gallery/radiation Although, you do need to have a sufficient data to make a good map, and when you're zoomed out too far it's inaccurate ie: http://www.poptix.net/gallery/boundary/all_radiation =) > -- > andyw at pobox.com > > Andy Warner Voice: (612) 801-8549 Fax: (208) 575-5634 -- Matthew S. Hallacy FUBAR, LART, BOFH Certified http://techmonkeys.org/~poptix GPG public key 0x01938203