Re: (ASCEND) Does the TNT support MPP on unchannelized T1 ports? (fwd)

[David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>]

Bruce Robertson sez:
> 
>     David> Is that wise? ISTM I'd heard that about ?6-8 B's? it was
>     David> more efficient to actually BOND than run MP......
> 
> Also, I'm not talking about combining 47 B channels with MPP, I'm
> talking about combining two UNchannelized T1 circuits.

That strikes me as a totally different story, and quite viable...



-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) Does the TNT support MPP on unchannelized T1 ports? (fwd)
• From: Bruce Robertson <bruce@greatbasin.net>

---

• Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Explanation of software codes
• Next by Date: (ASCEND) Clarification of Pool allocation requested
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Does the TNT support MPP on unchannelized T1 ports? (fwd)
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) Pipeline 85 and multiple destinations
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread