Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) RIP route filters (P50/MAX1800)
excellent. thanks Jason.
On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, Jason Nealis wrote:
> Why not have the CISCO's run HSRP and if one fails over the other
> one will become the default route, that way you can disable them
> listening to RIP have them just sending RIP updates instead of
> listening thus you don't need RIP filters.
>
> Jason Nealis
> Erols Internet
>
> On Sun, 1 Feb 1998, S.T.Balbach wrote:
>
> >
> > Would like to filter routes. Specifically inbound RIP announcements.
> >
> > Is there any mechanism for filtering RIP routes with Ascend?
> >
> > Here is the scenario:
> >
> > [border cisco1] [border cisco2]
> > | |
> > | |
> > ------------|--------------
> > |
> > [max18001]
> > [max18002]
> > [etc..]
> >
> >
> > cisco1 is the default gateway, unless it goes down and then cisco2
> > auto-falls over. Each cisco announces 0.0.0.0 via RIP, with cisco2
> > announcing with a higher prefrence/metric --
> >
> > We only want the max1800's to listen to default and nothing else.
> > otherwise the max1800 routing tables have unnecesary routes from the
> > other 1800's which slows performance and reliability and cranks up CPU as
> > the 1800's chatter back and forth.
> >
> > >From what Ive seen of the existing filters they only filter protocols, not
> > routes. Is this correct? New feature perhaps (nudge)? Controlling route
> > propegation is key.
> >
> > Stb
> >
> > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> > To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> >
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: