Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)

To: ascend-users@bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 20:00:34 -0800 (PST)
Organization: WPI Discordian Society, Undocumented Cabal of the Accursed Saint Shiranto Joe
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Once upon a time Kevin A. Smith shaped the electrons to say...
>>V.FAST -> V.34
>>V.PCM -> V.90
>No, I meant who coined it....

Not sure, I've seen it in ITU-T releases but I don't know if they started it.

>*require* ? Well since Lucent's answer to backward compatibility with
>V.FC/V.FAST was a resounding "no".....

They didn't support it in their code base, for them there wasn't backward
compatibility.  They do support K56flex, so it is expected that they
continue to do so - at least for a while.

-MZ
--
Lucent Remote Access Division - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com
For support requests: support@livingston.com  <http://www.livingston.com/> 
Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4048 Newbie Question
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) BACP for p75's?
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread