Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)

[Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>]

At 18:10 1998/02/06 -0800, MegaZone wrote:
>Of course, there is still the implementation question on how to
>maintain backwards compatibility with K56flex modems that do require
>it...  We'll see.

it is simple... you don't.

unlike V.FC modems, all but the very first K56Flex modems
keep their PCM code in upgradable Flash RAM,
there is no reason to not upgrade them to V.90.

-Jim H
----
Jim Howard             Sr Network Engineer        Lyceum Internet
jhoward@lyceum.com     http://www.lyceum.com/     404.248.1733     

My PGP Public Key: http://www.lyceum.com/~jhoward/pgp-key.txt
Fingerprint: 7E8B E2BA 1314 2535 CB08  CFF9 119B 7CD3 2488 954D

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
• Next by Date: RE: (ASCEND) Ascent Radius Attributes - clarification
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread