Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
My two cents,
>>Also, many will be happy to know that (the draft at least) V.90
>>does NOT include the V.8bis "burp tone" that has been tripping
>>many legacy modems on connecting.
>
>Of course, there is still the implementation question on how to
>maintain backwards compatibility with K56flex modems that do require
>it... We'll see.
They won't be able to `include' the V.8bis tone in their V.90
implementation unless they're going after "V.90Flex."
If the agreement does not allow for such an inclusion, as I believe it
doesn't, they can't burp. Therefore the "burp tone," may even be
undesirable, not optional. (Thought this was what MZ meant?)
junichi
>-MZ
>--
>Lucent Remote Access Division - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
>Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com
>For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/>
>Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: