Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)

[ascend@digistar.com]

On Mon, 9 Feb 1998, Junichi Kurokawa wrote:

> If the agreement does not allow for such an inclusion, as I believe it
> doesn't, they can't burp.  Therefore the "burp tone," may even be
> undesirable, not optional.  (Thought this was what MZ meant?)

What's the big deal with the v.8 tones?  Like, how hard is it to put a
couple of commas after the phone number?  Jeeeeez...

--
        
      /
  /  o     Jason Buchanan
 o         Digistar Microsystems
       /   jsb@digistar.com
      o    http://www.digistar.com/

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
• From: Junichi Kurokawa <jun@sinfony.ad.jp>

---

• Prev by Date: (ASCEND) v6.x vs. v5.0Ap42
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread