Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
On Mon, 9 Feb 1998 ascend@digistar.com wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 1998, Jason Nealis wrote:
>
> > Will Ascend have enough room on the DSP's for
>
> > V.FAST
> > V.FC
>
> bleh - screw v.fast. v.fc/v.fast sux :) I dealt with that
> Christless-protocol when I ran a BBS. I wound up disabling v.fc/v.fast.
I agree, If I had my choice I would have tossed out those protocols
about 18 months ago, but, As we support them now, then users expect us
to support them later, It's kinda hard to explain to a user why their
modem use to connect at 28.8 yesterday and today is maintaining a 300
baud connection, As much as I would love to say "It's cause you modem
blows chunks", I just can't do that :)
Jason Nealis
Director Internet Operations
Network Access
Erols Internet
>
> > I'm guessing not, So, I'm guessing (yet again) that support will be
> > dropped for the older legacy protocols of V.Fast and V.FC?
>
> That would be a good thing :) Just looking at a v.fc/v.fast connection
> causes the modem to retrain :)
>
>
> --
>
> /
> / o Jason Buchanan
> o Digistar Microsystems
> / jsb@digistar.com
> o http://www.digistar.com/
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: