Re: (ASCEND) v6.x vs. v5.0Ap42

To: ascend@digistar.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) v6.x vs. v5.0Ap42
From: Alex P <alex@stomp.gomax.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 13:22:10 -0500 (EST)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980209082231.32346C-100000@digistar.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Hi,

I've never used Ap42, but I've been running the beta code in production
for about a month now, and have nad _NO_ problems what so-ever.  The SNMP
features are working well, and I only use these boxes for v.34/K56
connections.  We have some ISDN use on one, but not enough to give it any
kind of workout.  I only have it on about 20 4004's right now, but am
about to put it on the rest.

Alex P

On Mon, 9 Feb 1998 ascend@digistar.com wrote:

> 
> Anyone out there running the beta code....!  what's your interpretation of
> its performance in comparison to 5.0Ap42?
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) v6.x vs. v5.0Ap42

From: ascend@digistar.com

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Radius wierdness
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Dual Login
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) v6.x vs. v5.0Ap42
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) v6.x vs. v5.0Ap42
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread