Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) v6.x vs. v5.0Ap42
I have 6.0b1 on one of my max 4048,
it has one trunk with 23 chan permanently dialed in ISDN data,
and 23 chan of dialup ISDN and/or modem.
I upgraded it two weeks ago, it ran for two days then crashed,
and has been up ever since (15 days now)
I'm afraid to touch it to upgrade to 6.0b4, it seems so happy. ;^)
-Jim H
At 13:22 1998/02/11 -0500, Alex P wrote:
>I've never used Ap42, but I've been running the beta code in production
>for about a month now, and have nad _NO_ problems what so-ever. The SNMP
>On Mon, 9 Feb 1998 ascend@digistar.com wrote:
>> Anyone out there running the beta code....! what's your interpretation of
>> its performance in comparison to 5.0Ap42?
> fat
OPERATOR RESET: Index: 99 Load: tik.m40 Revision: 6.0b1
Date: 01/25/1998. Time: 00:32:43
NVRAM was rebuilt
SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: tik.m40 Revision: 6.0b1
Date: 01/25/1998. Time: 00:33:59
FATAL ERROR: Index: 1 Load: tik.m40 Revision: 6.0b1
Date: 01/27/1998. Time: 11:22:21
Location: b0140354 b005fbe0 b0060498 b007ed40 b007eda0 b0126bf8
SYSTEM IS UP: Index: 100 Load: tik.m40 Revision: 6.0b1
Date: 01/27/1998. Time: 11:24:22
ascend% sh up
system uptime: up 15 days, 3 hours, 19 minutes, 53 seconds
----
Jim Howard Sr Network Engineer Lyceum Internet
jhoward@lyceum.com http://www.lyceum.com/ 404.248.1733
My PGP Public Key: http://www.lyceum.com/~jhoward/pgp-key.txt
Fingerprint: 7E8B E2BA 1314 2535 CB08 CFF9 119B 7CD3 2488 954D
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>