(ASCEND) Relaxation of the three digit NAT rule???

To: ascend-users@bungi.com (Ascend Users List)
Subject: (ASCEND) Relaxation of the three digit NAT rule???
From: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 11:35:09 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To: David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Did I read somewhere that later code removed the restriction
that the local private address space HAD to be xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
vice any of the octets being only 2 digit?

-- 
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) Relaxation of the three digit NAT rule???

From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) # in RADIUS users file (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 6.0 vs 5.0
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) P50/400B Conn Prob
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Relaxation of the three digit NAT rule???
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread