RE: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's

To: "James M Bass Esq." <jbass@FASTRANS.COM>
Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's
From: Franz Penz <fp@atnet.at>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 23:02:55 +0100 (CET)
cc: "'ascend-users@bungi.com'" <ascend-users@bungi.com>
In-Reply-To: <EFED58137FA1D111898E00A0C93314683801@medusa.fastrans.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, James M Bass Esq. wrote:

> 42 seems very stable for kflex/rip...  We have had record uptimes! (More
> than 2 weeks!)
> 

.. our Linux dialin servers have 70 weeks uptime - why did I think
we should change to an Ascned? :-/

- franz penz

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's

From: Darkshot <darkshot@chudys.com>

References:

RE: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's

From: "James M Bass Esq." <jbass@FASTRANS.COM>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Re: Ethernet Cards Blow.
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Security Breach, Wrong NAS Address
Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread