Re: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's

To: Franz Penz <fp@atnet.at>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's
From: Darkshot <darkshot@chudys.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 22:17:02 -0500
CC: "James M Bass Esq." <jbass@FASTRANS.COM>, "'ascend-users@bungi.com'" <ascend-users@bungi.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980223225909.5640O-100000@mail.atnet.at>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Franz Penz wrote:

> .. our Linux dialin servers have 70 weeks uptime - why did I think
> we should change to an Ascned? :-/
>
> - franz penz

I have a 486/33 running SCO UNIX that's been up since January 1991, but I'd
certainly not charge anyone to use it. What's your point? ;-)

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's

From: Franz Penz <fp@atnet.at>

References:

RE: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's

From: Franz Penz <fp@atnet.at>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Ascend bashing- actually these guys aren't all that bad
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) The comparison of 4048 to PM3
Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread