(ASCEND) Ascend bashing- actually these guys aren't all that bad

To: "'Ascend Mailing List'" <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Subject: (ASCEND) Ascend bashing- actually these guys aren't all that bad
From: "Eric R. Larsen" <eric@istal.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 22:26:38 -0500
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

For all the Ascend bashing I've done with the problems with modem connections early on, and their Radius program, Access Control, which leaves a lot to be desired by Winnt users, I have to admit the MAX4048 I bought back in June last year has performed like a trooper. No down time, and outside the month or so I dealt with the irritation of the memory leak last year, the system has operated almost worry free. 

Eric 
Internet Services of Tallahassee

On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, James M Bass Esq. wrote:
> 42 seems very stable for kflex/rip...  We have had record uptimes! (More
> than 2 weeks!)
> 

. our Linux dialin servers have 70 weeks uptime - why did I think
we should change to an Ascned? :-/
- franz penz
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) Ascend bashing- actually these guys aren't all that bad

From: John Coy <jcoy@anc.net>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) NEC Computer connection problems
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's
Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) Ascend-Third-Prompt
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Ascend bashing- actually these guys aren't all that bad
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread