Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Stable Ver for max4000's
Wish I could say the same for the 5.0Ap42 for the Max 1800.
We're not running kflex or RIP or OSPF. It was rebooting
with fatal error 29s.
Maybe that is the problem. Ascend spent all their time
optimizing Ap42 for everyone running OSPF and stacking
that they broke it unless you run it :)
Oliver J. Albrecht wrote:
>
> In article <EFED58137FA1D111898E00A0C93314683801@medusa.fastrans.net> you wrote:
>
> >42 seems very stable for kflex/rip... We have had record uptimes! (More
> >than 2 weeks!)
>
> We're running 5.0Ap42 on a max 4000 (OSPF, K56flex) and a max 2030
> (K56flex, ripV2) since the day p42 was released. Uptime is now past
> 30 days, no fat log entries, no obvious memory leaks either etc...
----------------------------------------------------------
Peter Chow
Chief Technical Advisor
InterQ Inc.
Tokyo, Japan
peter@interq.or.jp
----------------------------------------------------------
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: