Re: (ASCEND) Compression on Max40XX

To: Daniel <daniel@lynx.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Compression on Max40XX
From: Darkshot <darkshot@chudys.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 02:39:33 -0500
CC: ascend-users@bungi.com
References: <3.0.1.32.19980224175442.00e59c00@pop.lynx.bc.ca>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Daniel wrote:
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> I was wondering what is the different between different Compression option
> in Max40XX? Under the "Ethernet" "Answer", "PPP option" "link compression"
> I have "Stac","Stac-9","MS-Stac" and "None"
> 
> Which one should I use to optimize the throughtput? Most of our clients are
> Win95,NT

There are strong differences of opinion here that may be related to
telco issues at different sites. Basically your choices are Stac and
none; try them both and test the devil out of it, then implement it.

'Shot
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) Compression on Max40XX

From: Daniel <daniel@lynx.bc.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) The comparison of 4048 to PM3 (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Slowdowns with FTP/mail attachments
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Compression on Max40XX
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Bridging with MAX 4048
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread