Re: (ASCEND) Release 2.1.0

To: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Release 2.1.0
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 05:02:24 -0700
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980601002923.18783A-100000@babylon.erols.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 12:30 AM 6/1/98 -0400, Jason Nealis wrote:
>
> Under the known issues for Release 2.1.0 is states.
>
> Release 2.1.0 is not recommended for DM48's under heavy load,
>
>Eh? What exactly do you qualify as heavy load? Does this mean if your
>an ISP don't deploy? This is totally vague.

Sorry about the vagueness. This refers to the older V.34 modems which don't
have the memory to keep up with the newer features when fully loaded with
48 calls each passing data.

The newer 56K modems work fine.

Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) Release 2.1.0

From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) 6.1 for Pipelines
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) restricted / extended loads = appology
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Release 2.1.0
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Eh? Why release a broken OS?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread