Re: (ASCEND) Is it ftik 6.1 bugged?

[Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>]

> I think there is either a lot higher memory usage or another memory leak in
> eik.m40.

 It's not just the eik.m40 load it's all loads of 6.1, From what I have
seen the code is much more of a memory hog then ever, I have seen weird
Warning message's since deployment which are all because of a lack of
resources, I also push the Max 4004 platform harder than most people.

Jason Nealis
Director Internet Operations / Network Access
Erols Internet (An RCN Company)



> 
> 
>  > pools -v
> Validating free lists...
> 0 errors; 122 buffers; 482624 bytes memory free
> 
> 10 minutes uptime, about 75 users online.
> 
> 
> --
> Thomas Schenk <ts@ndh.net>, Technischer Leiter	 fon : 02203/93530-0
> NDH Netzwerkdienste Hoeger GmbH			 fax : 02203/93530-99
> 51149 Koeln, Theodor-Heuss-Str. 92-100, DE	 http://www.ndh.net
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) Is it ftik 6.1 bugged?
• From: Thomas Schenk <ts@ndh.net>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Is it ftik 6.1 bugged?
• Next by Date: (ASCEND) Brand new Max4048 for sale $9500 OBO
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Is it ftik 6.1 bugged?
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Is it ftik 6.1 bugged?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread