Re: (ASCEND) Is it ftik 6.1 bugged?

To: ascend-users@bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Is it ftik 6.1 bugged?
From: "Oliver J. Albrecht" <oj@nexus.flensbone.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 04:22:29 +0200
In-Reply-To: <29a1ab7ec3ec@news.allcon.net> <19980603222127.40927@ndh.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com
User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980202 (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.33 (i586))

In article <19980603222127.40927@ndh.net> you wrote:

>> We have none of these problems with the E1 version, although we
>> do have a bunch of others:
>> 

>I think there is either a lot higher memory usage or another memory leak in
>eik.m40.

Seems like a sharp increase in memory usage to me, it's clearly visibly with
feik.m40 as well. I'd estimate it to be around 400KB of additional usage 
compared to 5.0Ap48. Not really critical for us, since the maxen we use are
1-2 PRI units (2012, 4030) only.

-- 
Oliver J. Albrecht <oj@nexus.flensbone.net>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) Is it ftik 6.1 bugged?

From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Procesing information
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Is it ftik 6.1 bugged?
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Is it ftik 6.1 bugged?
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Is it ftik 6.1 bugged?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread