Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) STAC Compression? (fwd)
So Matt,
Are you making an official recomendation not to use STAC at all?
-Jess Martinez-
East County Internet Services, Inc.
510-706-4280
http://www.ecis.com
On Fri, 20 Feb 1998, Matt Holdrege wrote:
> At 08:00 AM 2/20/98 -0500, Jeff A Culverhouse wrote:
> >On Fri, 20 Feb 1998, MegaZone wrote:
> >
> >> >>1) Stac (Ascend native version)
> >> >>2) Stac-9 (Stac LZS Option 3)
> >> >>3) MS-Stac (Stac LZS Option 4)
> >
> >So, what is the best option to use? Weren't there performance problems
> >using MS-Stac? Since most of our users are Win 95, is MS-Stac the best
> >choice? What does everyone use??
>
> STAC is STAC. The different types mentioned above do not necessarily
> reflect different performance levels.
>
> However when it comes to Windows and modems, it seems that STAC is best
> avoided. You should only rely on V.42 for compression in the modems. STAC
> seems to make performance worse in 99% of the cases.
>
> Matt Holdrege http://www.ascend.com matt@ascend.com
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: