Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) STAC Compression? (fwd)
Note that I specifically referred to windows and modems. That means using
MS-STAC when you have negotiated V.42bis. With ISDN, STAC *may* be quite
effective depending on the type of data.
At 09:30 AM 2/20/98 -0800, Jesse Martinez wrote:
>So Matt,
>
> Are you making an official recomendation not to use STAC at all?
>
>-Jess Martinez-
>East County Internet Services, Inc.
>510-706-4280
>http://www.ecis.com
>
>On Fri, 20 Feb 1998, Matt Holdrege wrote:
>
>> At 08:00 AM 2/20/98 -0500, Jeff A Culverhouse wrote:
>> >On Fri, 20 Feb 1998, MegaZone wrote:
>> >
>> >> >>1) Stac (Ascend native version)
>> >> >>2) Stac-9 (Stac LZS Option 3)
>> >> >>3) MS-Stac (Stac LZS Option 4)
>> >
>> >So, what is the best option to use? Weren't there performance problems
>> >using MS-Stac? Since most of our users are Win 95, is MS-Stac the best
>> >choice? What does everyone use??
>>
>> STAC is STAC. The different types mentioned above do not necessarily
>> reflect different performance levels.
>>
>> However when it comes to Windows and modems, it seems that STAC is best
>> avoided. You should only rely on V.42 for compression in the modems. STAC
>> seems to make performance worse in 99% of the cases.
>>
>> Matt Holdrege http://www.ascend.com matt@ascend.com
>> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>>
>
>
Matt Holdrege http://www.ascend.com matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: