Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring

To: vanilla-list@us.netrek.org
Subject: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
From: James Cameron <quozl@us.netrek.org>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 17:12:38 +1000
Cc: tanner@real-time.com
In-Reply-To: <200005160603.e4G63X500555@denali.ccs.neu.edu>; from jeffno@ccs.neu.edu on Tue, May 16, 2000 at 02:03:33AM -0400
Mail-Followup-To: vanilla-list@us.netrek.org, tanner@real-time.com
Organization: Netrek Vanilla Server Dictator
References: <20000515184354.A200482@cecum.vec.wfubmc.edu> <200005160603.e4G63X500555@denali.ccs.neu.edu>
Sender: quozl@us.netrek.org

On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 02:03:33AM -0400, Jeffrey Nowakowski wrote:
> Hmm, I didn't get any commit notices via email.  Does this mean we
> have cut over to using SourceForge for CVS?

No, it means the commit notice must be broken.  Hey, Bob!

> As far as commiting this code, why?  Isn't this what CVS branches are
> for?  There were a ton of proposals for continuous scoring.  To put
> one into CVS right now seems irresponsible.

I don't object at this stage.  I can always back out.  Simpler than
learning how to cope with branches.  We aren't close to a release so
I'm not unduly concerned about a polluted CVS copy.  We never said CVS
was stable or anything.

-- 
James Cameron   mailto:quozl@us.netrek.org   http://quozl.us.netrek.org/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
  - From: Jeffrey Nowakowski <jeffno@ccs.neu.edu>

References:
- continuous scoring
  - From: Dave Ahn <ahn@vec.wfubmc.edu>
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
  - From: Jeffrey Nowakowski <jeffno@ccs.neu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
Next by Date: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
Prev by thread: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
Next by thread: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:3194] continuous scoring
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread