[VANILLA-L:522] Re: INL Server Code development

To: Multiple recipients of list <vanilla-l@anthrax.ecst.csuchico.edu>
Subject: [VANILLA-L:522] Re: INL Server Code development
From: "NBT Nick B. Trown" <nbt@landacorp.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 19:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: vanilla-l@anthrax.ecst.csuchico.edu
Resent-Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 20:58:18 -0500
Resent-From: tanner@real-time.com
Resent-Message-Id: <199705030158.UAA15579@wizard.real-time.com>
Resent-To: netrek@real-time.com
Sender: vanilla-l@anthrax.ecst.csuchico.edu



>----------
>From: 	cameron@ripper.stl.dec.com[SMTP:cameron@ripper.stl.dec.com]
>Sent: 	Friday, April 18, 1997 4:31 PM
>To: 	Multiple recipients of list
>Subject: 	[VANILLA-L:519] Re: INL Server Code development
>
>> Should we up the slot count?
>
>Yes, but perhaps a set of slots for non-ship robots, so they can be omitted
>from the costly loops for which an increase in slots dramatically increases
>the processing.
>
>How closely bound to the slot structure is DS?  ;-)

It shouldn't affect the DS at all, the DS should recognize the increase
in slots
and deal with them appopriately. I kind of like the idea of having
robot-specific
slots. 16 player slots + 4 observer slots + 2-4 robot slots would be
cool I 
think.


Nick
>--
>James Cameron                                    (cameron@stl.dec.com)
>Digital Equipment Corporation (Australia) Pty. Ltd. A.C.N. 000 446 800
>

Prev by Date: [VANILLA-L:523] Re: The server and parallel programming bugs
Next by Date: [VANILLA-L:519] Re: INL Server Code development
Prev by thread: [VANILLA-L:519] Re: INL Server Code development
Next by thread: [VANILLA-L:523] Re: The server and parallel programming bugs
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread