[VANILLA-L:519] Re: INL Server Code development

To: Multiple recipients of list <vanilla-l@anthrax.ecst.csuchico.edu>
Subject: [VANILLA-L:519] Re: INL Server Code development
From: cameron@ripper.stl.dec.com (James Cameron)
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 16:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: vanilla-l@anthrax.ecst.csuchico.edu
Resent-Date: Fri, 2 May 1997 21:08:17 -0500
Resent-From: tanner@real-time.com
Resent-Message-Id: <199705030208.VAA15640@wizard.real-time.com>
Resent-To: netrek@real-time.com
Sender: vanilla-l@anthrax.ecst.csuchico.edu

> Should we up the slot count?

Yes, but perhaps a set of slots for non-ship robots, so they can be omitted
from the costly loops for which an increase in slots dramatically increases
the processing.

How closely bound to the slot structure is DS?  ;-)

--
James Cameron                                    (cameron@stl.dec.com)
Digital Equipment Corporation (Australia) Pty. Ltd. A.C.N. 000 446 800

Prev by Date: [VANILLA-L:522] Re: INL Server Code development
Next by Date: [VANILLA-L:517] Re: RGN: 24 Hour LPS thread
Prev by thread: [VANILLA-L:517] Re: RGN: 24 Hour LPS thread
Next by thread: [VANILLA-L:522] Re: INL Server Code development
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread