[VANILLA-L:23] Re: [VANILLA-L:11] Re: [VANILLA-L:7] Re: [VANILLA-L:1] Re: [VANILLA-L:881] Enable the "who" command?

["Steve Sheldon" <sheldon@visi.com>]

Dave Ahn wrote:
>They are not moot points.  I object on principle.  I hope Bob follows
>Netiquette and keeps the list addresses private.  Looking at the lack of
>response on this list, though, I seem to be the only one who gives a damn.
>Oh well, time to add more rules to my .procmailrc.

 I'm not sure exactly how Netiquette comes into play here, could you please
provide a reference for this?

 I think you are making silly arguments against this, and trying to take
some sort of higher moral grounds response.

 Frankly, I doubt any email spammer cares a whit about vanilla-l email list.

 On the other hand, I don't care a white about who is on the vanilla-l email
list either.

 I say to JeffNo, if you want to make sure someone receives a post, cc it to
them anyway.  If they get two copies and complain, just tell them it was
Dave Ahn's fault.

 Ok, problem solved.  I joined the list to talk about the server code.

Steve
+
++ Vanilla-l Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe vanilla-l" to majordomo@real-time.com
For more information: http://archives.real-time.com

---

References:

• [VANILLA-L:11] Re: [VANILLA-L:7] Re: [VANILLA-L:1] Re: [VANILLA-L:881] Enable the "who" command?
• From: Dave Ahn <ahn@vec.wfubmc.edu>

---

• Prev by Date: [VANILLA-L:27] Re: [VANILLA-L:15] Re: [VANILLA-L:11] Re: [VANILLA-L:7] Re: [VANILLA-L:1] Re: [VANILLA-L:881] Enable the "who" command?
• Next by Date: [VANILLA-L:21] Re: [VANILLA-L:20] struct.h in 2_7
• Prev by thread: [VANILLA-L:28] Re: [VANILLA-L:16] Re: [VANILLA-L:11] Re: [VANILLA-L:7] Re: [VANILLA-L:1] Re: [VANILLA-L:881] Enable the "who" command?
• Next by thread: [VANILLA-L:5] Re: [VANILLA-L:2] Re: [VANILLA-L:881] Enable the "who" command?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread