Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)

To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 1998 21:46:16 -0800 (PST)
Organization: WPI Discordian Society, Undocumented Cabal of the Accursed Saint Shiranto Joe
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Once upon a time Jim Howard shaped the electrons to say...
>unlike V.FC modems, all but the very first K56Flex modems
>keep their PCM code in upgradable Flash RAM,
>there is no reason to not upgrade them to V.90.

Sure - but as others have said users have a tendency to NOT upgrade.
So if you have hundreds or thousands of users with K56flex modems are
you just going to order them all to upgrade or else?  Especially if you
have competition willing to keep their servers compatible.

-MZ
--
Lucent Remote Access Division - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs
Phone: 800-458-9966 510-737-2100 FAX: 510-737-2110 megazone@livingston.com
For support requests: support@livingston.com  <http://www.livingston.com/> 
Snail mail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 6.0b4 for the Pipeline family
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Follow up to NAT question
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread