Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Woopeee... 56k ITU Decision (fwd)
The V.8 tone does pose a problem that cannot be taken lightly. First of
all, the additional commas don't always work... I tried it. Secondly, when
you have thousands of non-computer-literate staff who access the enterprise
network primarily over dial-in, getting them to insert commas when they
don't even know how to chang phone numbers gets to be a real problem.
Just another point of view.
-------------
Original Text
From: ascend@digistar.com, on 2/9/98 8:22 AM:
To:
Cc: <ascend-users@max.bungi.com>
On Mon, 9 Feb 1998, Junichi Kurokawa wrote:
> If the agreement does not allow for such an inclusion, as I believe it
> doesn't, they can't burp. Therefore the "burp tone," may even be
> undesirable, not optional. (Thought this was what MZ meant?)
What's the big deal with the v.8 tones? Like, how hard is it to put a
couple of commas after the phone number? Jeeeeez...
--
/
/ o Jason Buchanan
o Digistar Microsystems
/ jsb@digistar.com
o http://www.digistar.com/
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups: