(ASCEND) 6.0 vs 5.0

To: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>
Subject: (ASCEND) 6.0 vs 5.0
From: ascend@digistar.com
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 08:40:21 -0600 (CST)
cc: Peter Stemwedel <petes@interaccess.com>, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980216231631.8227A-100000@babylon.erols.com>
Reply-To: ascend@digistar.com
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On Mon, 16 Feb 1998, Jason Nealis wrote:

>  I may be wrong, But I believe that is included in the upcomming 6.0
> code, Can anyone confirm this? 

Speaking of 6.0...  what's your interpretation of 6.0's performance vs.
5.0's?  I'm thinking about upgrading a few office 4000s to 6.0b4 (or
whatever's the latest) but i'm wondering if there's any OSPF improvements,
etc.

later...
jsb

--

      /
  /  o     Jason Buchanan
 o         Digistar Microsystems
       /   jsb@digistar.com
      o    http://www.digistar.com/

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

(ASCEND) Re: 6.0 vs 5.0

From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>

Re: (ASCEND) 6.0 vs 5.0

From: "Mike Hughes" <mike@dircon.net>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) RADIUS attribute for tx and rx?

From: Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>

Prev by Date: RE: (ASCEND) RADIUS attribute for tx and rx?
Next by Date: (ASCEND) # in RADIUS users file
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) RADIUS attribute for tx and rx?
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 6.0 vs 5.0
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread