Re: (ASCEND) Re: v.90

[Darkshot <darkshot@chudys.com>]

Peter Lalor wrote:
> 

> Hmm. This must mean that:
> 
> A: The v.90 code is _really_ bad.
> B: Ascend heard the piteous cries of the damned early Flex users, and
> decided to go for stability before unleashing the hounds this time.
> 
> I hope it's B, but in any case I won't be first out of the gate this time...
> 

Yeah, you can always tell the pioneers by the arrows in their backs. ;-)

'Shot
Glory Road - North Carolina's FIRST K56Flex ISP. Boy, was THAT fun. ;-)
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• (ASCEND) Re: v.90
• From: Peter Lalor <plalor@infoasis.com>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Re: v.90
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Re: P75 6.0 analog trouble
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Re: v.90
• Next by thread: (ASCEND) Pipeline 15 1.0Ci2 Wizard release
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread