Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Re: v.90
At 07:53 PM 2/27/98 -0800, Kevin A. Smith wrote:
>At 06:38 PM 2/27/98 -0800, Peter Lalor wrote:
>>Hmm. This must mean that:
>>
>>A: The v.90 code is _really_ bad.
It means that it needs a lot of testing. First they have to get it running
properly in the lab. This takes a while and they do all sorts of stress
testing. Then it has to be tested in the real world. As we are all
painfully aware, phone line quality varies quite a bit. As do the central
offices.
So they test in all sorts of locations like the ones I've listed below in
order of quality...
Silicon Valley
Chicago
New York
Paris
London
Holiday Inn hotels
North Dakota
Moscow
Tijuana
Uruguay
sleazy motels
Outer Mongolia
Boston
Matt Holdrege http://www.ascend.com matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: